In the present world, there have been many attempts by the scholar to bring forth various interpretations of Christian religion but all the time with notable differences. There have also been attempts to bridge the gap, but still, there is a rift between the conservative and the modern liberals who have different views of the same scriptures. Following are some valuable viewpoints of Tempe liberal church.
The first to discuss is the authority of the religion as a true belief. Their perspective is that there is no sole authority powerhouse, but they acknowledge the contribution of modern knowledge and experience in interpretation of Holy Scriptures. They believe that Christianity should be modern and progressive thereby undergoing a sense of revolution in its way of interpretation thus relevant without being based on external authority.
They also have another task of revolving the world into a better place for everyone. This could be seen as a contrary view of the coming of a new fair world ruled by the Christ as sited in scriptures. They explain that they believe in the coming of such an authority but also wants people and more so Christians to create a good place for everyone rather than stay without doing anything.
It is also their pillar that the religion should be credible and relevant to the modern social setup. It is open to modern judgments based on intellectual in connection with inquiries about nature and even on perspectives given by modern social science. It promotes the need for an ethical way of life and supports the moral concept of atonement. It is to make the gospel relevant to modern society.
They also divert the thought that only particular ways of truths are the sole truth, especially where presented in certain forms and symbols. They advocate for changes that will lead to more reasonable interpretation rather than symbolic or analogy that was presented by predecessors and made like the truth itself. They discourage adoration of symbols and forms as the real truths.
It is also their explanation that the current differences on various issues on fundamental faith beliefs could be a product of interpretation and language barriers. They believe there is one fundamental thing that is faith or belief, but the presentation is marred with ambiguities that yield grounds for disagreements. The main concern is the central belief but also believe that language is the main course of disagreements.
It is also important to understand that historical accuracies of biblical facts and flow of events as presented in the bible are not the basis of faith. Their main concern is the general teaching of Christ in all those passages in the gospels. It is not about the accuracy of flow of events but the truths presented by each storyline or narration rather than its chronological order in various books.
According to them, true religion is based on the way of Christ not all existing doctrine about the Messiah. They argue that this religion is a faith, not a doctrine of Christ where its main focus is learning about Christ. Their belief is the Christ himself and his main goal of saving mankind.
The first to discuss is the authority of the religion as a true belief. Their perspective is that there is no sole authority powerhouse, but they acknowledge the contribution of modern knowledge and experience in interpretation of Holy Scriptures. They believe that Christianity should be modern and progressive thereby undergoing a sense of revolution in its way of interpretation thus relevant without being based on external authority.
They also have another task of revolving the world into a better place for everyone. This could be seen as a contrary view of the coming of a new fair world ruled by the Christ as sited in scriptures. They explain that they believe in the coming of such an authority but also wants people and more so Christians to create a good place for everyone rather than stay without doing anything.
It is also their pillar that the religion should be credible and relevant to the modern social setup. It is open to modern judgments based on intellectual in connection with inquiries about nature and even on perspectives given by modern social science. It promotes the need for an ethical way of life and supports the moral concept of atonement. It is to make the gospel relevant to modern society.
They also divert the thought that only particular ways of truths are the sole truth, especially where presented in certain forms and symbols. They advocate for changes that will lead to more reasonable interpretation rather than symbolic or analogy that was presented by predecessors and made like the truth itself. They discourage adoration of symbols and forms as the real truths.
It is also their explanation that the current differences on various issues on fundamental faith beliefs could be a product of interpretation and language barriers. They believe there is one fundamental thing that is faith or belief, but the presentation is marred with ambiguities that yield grounds for disagreements. The main concern is the central belief but also believe that language is the main course of disagreements.
It is also important to understand that historical accuracies of biblical facts and flow of events as presented in the bible are not the basis of faith. Their main concern is the general teaching of Christ in all those passages in the gospels. It is not about the accuracy of flow of events but the truths presented by each storyline or narration rather than its chronological order in various books.
According to them, true religion is based on the way of Christ not all existing doctrine about the Messiah. They argue that this religion is a faith, not a doctrine of Christ where its main focus is learning about Christ. Their belief is the Christ himself and his main goal of saving mankind.
About the Author:
Tempe liberal church invites you to pay a quick visit to its official website. Here is the web page you need at http://www.desertpalmucc.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment